Assessment in SEPUP
SEPUP materials provide a research-based assessment system develop in
cooperation with the University of California Graduate School of Education.
The assessment system provides rubrics (called scoring guides). Student
responses to questions already embedded in the student material can be
scored using these scoring guides.
Teachers familiar with "holistic scoring" will notice similarities
between the use of rubrics and the SEPUP scoring guides. The scoring
guides have been developed so that an individual scoring guide can be
used for all of the assessments relating to a particular skill throughout
the entire course.
What do the scoring guides assess?
How do I use the scoring guides?
Can you show me an example?
How do I know when to score sudents?
How do I grade student answers?
Where can I find more web-based examples of SEPUP
assessment?
What do the scoring guides assess?
There are several different scoring guides (similar to rubrics) that
can be used to assess students. Each scoring guide focuses on a different
skill. SEPUP has developed scoring guides to assess students on their
ability to:
-
design and conduct an investigation
-
analyze data
-
understand concepts
-
evaluate evidence and identify tradeoffs
-
communicate scientific information
-
work cooperatively in a group
^ top
How do I use the scoring guides?
There are five possible levels, from 0–4, on each scoring guide.
Each level indicates a quality of response, as shown in the table below.
A score level of 4 is considered an advanced response because it goes
beyond being complete and correct in some significant way, such as providing
additional analysis or information.
Level on a
SEPUP scoring guide
|
Student response
|
4
|
Complete, correct, and beyond
|
3
|
Complete and correct
|
2
|
Partially correct and/or incomplete
|
1
|
Incorrect
|
0
|
Off task or not attempted
|
To receive a particular score level, a response must fulfill all the requirements
of the lower levels in addition to the requirements of the higher score.
For example, even if only one aspect of a response is incorrect or incomplete,
a student should not receive a level 3 score. For most students, achieving
consistent level 3 responses would be an indicator of academic success. This
is why the standards for each level should be kept consistent. By maintaining
the integrity of scoring, teachers can help high-performing students (as
well as lower-achieving students) improve the quality of their work.
^ top
Can you show me an example?
In the first few activities of Science and Life Issues,
students examine scientific approaches to investigating problems. In
Activity 2, "The Pellagra Story," students watch a video segment
on the work of Dr. Joseph Goldberger, a scientist of the early 1900s.
He was asked to investigate the cause of pellagra, a disease affecting
thousands of people in the U.S. His investigations led him to conclude
that pellagra was not an infectious or genetic disease, but a nutritional
deficiency. The student book poses the following question.
Compare the steps of the traditional scientific method to the steps
Dr. Goldberger followed to investigate pellagra. How were the steps
the same? How were the steps different?
This question is identified as an assessment that can be scored using
the Understanding Concepts scoring guide. A sample level 3 response is
provided below:
The traditional scientific method begins by stating a problem. Dr. Goldberger
was presented with a problem when he was asked to investigate pellagra
and its causes. The next step of the traditional scientific method is
to form a hypothesis. Dr. Goldberger hypothesized that an inadequate
diet was the cause of pellagra. The next step is doing the experiment,
which Dr. Goldberger did when he fed the orphans a balanced diet and
cured their pellagra.
In the traditional scientific method, the next step is recording and
analyzing data. Dr. Goldberger recorded and analyzed data when he examined
the results of his experiment. The way in which Dr. Goldberger’s
work differed from the traditional scientific method was that he did
not form a conclusion immediately after his first experiment with the
orphans. Dr. Goldberger decided to obtain more evidence through experiments
on prisoners. Only then did he conclude that his hypothesis was correct.
After reading this response, you may feel that your students are not
ready to produce such a complete response. Helping students develop the
skills to write this type of a response is an overarching purpose of
the SEPUP assessment system. You may begin the school year by sharing
this "ideal" response with students, and help them revise their
work until it is at a level 3. Since they will continue to be assessed
on these types of questions, they can continue to build their skills
over the course of the school year.
^ top
How do I know when to score a student response?
Written responses that are appropriate for scoring are identified by
icons in the Teacher’s Guide and contain a complete and correct
sample response. For example, an Analysis Question may be marked with
a small box containing the abbreviation "ET." This indicates
that this question can be assessed with the Using Evidence to Make Tradeoffs
scoring guide. In addition, questions that can be assessed are usually
identified in the introductory material of the Teacher’s Guide
and in an appendix on assessment.
Opportunities for teachers to assess student performance (as opposed
to written materials) are identified in the Teacher’s Guide entry
for each activity, as well as in the introductory material of the Teacher’s
Guide.
^ top
How do I grade student answers?
The scores that students receive using the scoring guides are not equivalent
to grades. Most students are not likely to achieve many level 3 or level
4 scores at the beginning of the school year. Teachers using the SEPUP
assessment system have decided on various methods for translating student
performance into grades.
One method is to use to students’ scores over a grading period
to create a grading scale. For example, the total number of assessed
assignments may be ten. If a student received a level 3 (complete and
correct) on each assignment, the total number of points would be 30.
Early in the school year, the majority of students may be receiving a
level 2 or lower. A student who received a total of 18 (perhaps 8 of
10 assignments achieved a score level of 2) may be assigned a "B." The
number of points required to earn a "B" may change over the
school year as student performance improves.
Another method is to declare in advance that students earn a certain
number of scores at a particular score level to achieve a certain grade.
For example, if you plan to assess ten assignments during an early grading
period, you may require students to achieve a score level of 3 on at
least five of the assignments in order to receive an "A." This
number should change as the school year progresses and students are expected
to produce an increasing proportion of level 3 responses.
Some teachers count a score more than once if the assignment is considered
a more important assessment than previous assessments. Other teachers
translate scores into their own point system, which may or may not be
based on the traditional 100 point system. You may find yourself experimenting
with more than one approach until you find the one that works best for
you and your student population.
^ top
Where can I find more web-based examples
of SEPUP assessment?
You can find more examples of this and other assessment approaches at Evidence
of Understanding: An Introduction to Assessments in K–12 Science
Curricula, prepared by the Center for Science Education at Education
Development Center, Inc. (EDC). To see how the SEPUP Assessment System
evaluates student achievement:
^ top
|